Key takeaways
- Europe shows tentative signs of improvement, but the recovery remains uneven
- AI investment is increasingly influencing U.S. capital spending and trade
- The next phase of the AI story may depend more on productivity and returns
Europe shows tentative signs of improvement
This week, our Portfolio Manager Olga Bezrokov sees tentative signs of improvement emerging in Europe, although she cautions that the recovery remains uneven across countries and sectors.
Germany provided the clearest evidence of stabilization. The Ifo Business Climate Index rose to 88.8 in August from 86.7 in July, its strongest reading in roughly a year. Assessments of both current conditions and the outlook improved, while manufacturing companies reported a more constructive production outlook for the coming months.
German consumer sentiment also became somewhat less pessimistic, with the consumer climate indicator for September improving to -26.6 from a revised -29.4.
That strength has not been broad-based. French consumer confidence remained unchanged at 86, well below its long-term average of 100, while the UK CBI retail sales balance deteriorated to -48 in August from -26 in July.
As Bezrokov explains, the divergence reinforces the importance of looking beneath the regional headlines. Rather than a synchronized European recovery, the data points to greater differentiation across countries and sectors. For investors, that may increase the importance of underlying country and industry exposures rather than treating Europe as a single macroeconomic trade.
AI becomes more than a technology story
In the U.S., economic data remained broadly consistent with recent trends. Second-quarter GDP growth was confirmed at a 1.5% annualized rate, down from 2.1% in the first quarter, while initial unemployment claims remained low at 203,000.
Taken together, the figures point toward an economy that is moderating rather than contracting, with the labor market continuing to provide an important source of resilience.
However, Bezrokov highlights that the more distinctive development came from the corporate sector.
Nvidia reported quarterly revenue of $96.2 billion, an increase of 106% from a year earlier. Data center revenue reached $89 billion, up 117% year over year. The company also guided to approximately $108 billion of revenue for the next quarter, plus or minus 2%, despite assuming no data center compute revenue from China.
The results provide further evidence of the extraordinary demand for AI infrastructure. However, as Bezrokov notes, the investment debate is beginning to move on.
The question is less about whether companies will continue spending on AI and more about what that investment can ultimately generate. As capital expenditure rises, investors are likely to place greater emphasis on productivity gains, earnings growth and returns on invested capital, particularly in areas of the technology sector where valuations already reflect substantial expectations for future growth.
AI buildout reaches the wider economy
Bezrokov makes a key point: there is more to the AI investment cycle than technology-sector earnings. The scale of infrastructure spending is increasingly visible in broader U.S. economic data. The goods trade deficit widened to $118.8 billion in July from $101.4 billion in June, as imports increased 3.7% and exports declined 2.9%.
The composition of those imports was particularly notable. Capital-goods imports rose 11.3% during the month to approximately $140 billion, leaving the category almost 47% above its level a year earlier.
Capital goods cover a broad range of products, meaning the increase cannot be attributed entirely to AI. However, the category includes computers, computer peripherals, semiconductors and telecommunications equipment, all important components of the current data center buildout.
Recent GDP data tells a similar story, with continued strength in business investment across equipment and intellectual property, including information-processing technology.
Crucially, Bezrokov suggests that AI is becoming more than an equity market theme. Its economic footprint is now large enough to influence capital expenditure, imports and even the composition of U.S. growth.
Articles of the week:
What the new Section 338 tariffs mean for the U.S. and Canada