Beware the lurking tax hit in many non-U.S. equity funds

A change in the 2010 tax code may have a material impact on after-tax returns in coming years. Non-U.S. equity funds may feel the pinch the hardest. Make sure to position your clients’ portfolios before it’s too late. A quick primer: The Global Financial Crisis and Capital Loss Carry Forwards (CLCFs) We all remember the Global Financial Crisis, when global stocks dropped -42% for the calendar year 2008, according to the MSCI All Country World Index. But it wasn’t all bad news for many mutual fund investors. Here’s why: While mutual funds are required to distribute realized gains to shareholders, they do not distribute realized losses. If the realized losses are bigger than gains in a given year, mutual funds are able to carry them forward into future years to be used to offset against future gains. This tax offset is called Capital Loss Carry Forward (CLCF). CLCFs since 2008 For the past eight years, investors in funds with CLCFs have benefited from the CLCFs in two primary ways:
  • Reduced capital gains tax bills – because many mutual funds have used their CLCFs to offset gains coming out of 2008
  • Improved after-tax returns.
U.S. equity mutual funds and CLCFs Over the years, the strong U.S. equity market gains since 2008 have caused many U.S. mutual funds to deplete their CLCF reserves. As a result, investors in many cases have seen an increase in taxable distributions – as depicted in the exhibit below – and a reduction in after-tax returns. Source: ICI 2016 Factbook Source: ICI 2016 Factbook According to Morningstar, as a whole, U.S. equity funds (active, passive, ETFs) gave up 2% of returns for the three-year period ending June 2016 to taxes – that’s twice as much as the 10-year average of just over 1% of returns given up to taxes. For example, a mutual fund with a 10% pre-tax, three-year annualized return actually had a return of only 8% on an after-tax basis. This loss of return (“tax drag”) of 2% is really a hidden expense ratio that can have a material impact on an investor’s ability to reach their desired outcomes. Too many investors fail to consider the tax drag as a factor when evaluating taxable investment options.   Non-U.S. equity mutual funds and CLCFs It’s a different story for many non-U.S. equity funds. For the past five years ending July 2016, non-U.S. equity markets have trailed U.S. equity markets by quite a wide margin. Source: U.S. equities – S&P 500 Index. Non-U.S. equities – Russell Global ex-U.S. Index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Indexes are not managed and cannot be invested in directly. Source: U.S. equities – S&P 500 Index. Non-U.S. equities – Russell Global ex-U.S. Index.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Indexes are not managed and cannot be invested in directly. As a result, many non-U.S. equity funds still have CLCFs that they’d built up in 2008/2009 in reserve today. Taken together, the lower market returns and larger CLCFs for many non-U.S. equity funds (both International and Emerging) have amounted to non-U.S. equity mutual funds as a whole losing only 0.95% to taxes for the three years ending June 2016. Tax drag Morningstar: Tax Cost Ratio, Russell Investments: average Changes to tax treatment of CLCFs: implications for mutual funds Unfortunately, a substantial portion of the CLCFs many international equity funds have accrued may soon be expiring without funds being able to use them up – because of a tax code change made in 2010. The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 changed the tax rules so that any CLCF that occurred in taxable years before December 22, 2010 expire eight years after occurrence while CLCFs that occurred after December 22, 2010 can be carried forward indefinitely. The challenge is, many of the CLCFs mutual funds have on their balance sheets were created during the Great Financial Crisis in 2008 and 2009. So, under the 2010 Act, they are set to expire in 2016 and 2017. To make matters worse, the CLCFs accrued after the new tax rule was enacted must be used before a fund can use CLCFs banked before the rule was enacted. This further increases the odds of these pre-enactment CLCF’s expiring. Many funds could well be losing a valuable tax offset from their balance sheets. If non-U.S. equities see modest returns closer to their long term average, the amount of capital gains distributed to investors will likely increase and the amount of after-tax return investors receive will decrease. How can advisors help clients who may be affected? Step 1: Determine whether or not your clients might be affected. This will require a bit of digging.
  1. Typically, a fund will publish a schedule of its CLCFs in their annual Statement of Additional Information. Below is an example of how the data may be presented. expiring-capital-loss-sm
  2. For each fund your clients hold, note how much CLCF is expiring and when. In the hypothetical example above, the Core International Fund has $20 million of CLCF expiring in fiscal year 2016, $113.7 million expiring in 2017 and another $25 million expiring in 2018.
  3. Measure the materiality of the expiring CLCF by comparing its size to that of the overall mutual fund. If the expiring CLCF represents a small percentage of the fund’s total AUM, it would only take modest positive market returns to eat through the CLCF.
Step 2: Consider moving affected investors, as appropriate, to funds that are tax-managed by design. If the mutual fund’s investment objective mentions tax management, it opens up the toolkit the fund can use in an attempt to dial down tax drag and maximize after-tax return. Step 3: Don’t delay. Don’t wait until after the CLCFs expire before making this investment change. Delaying the decision may cause an additional and avoidable taxable event. Starting a tax-managed international equity approach before the CLCFs expire may lessen any related tax hit on appreciation of shares from now until the point when you decide to make a tax-managed move. You could also consider having clients invest new dollars and reinvest future distributions immediately in a tax-managed approach.

The bottom line

Investing beyond U.S. borders has the potential to improve returns and offer attractive diversification benefits, although diversification doesn’t protect against a loss. To further help reap the rewards of the potential return benefit of non-U.S. investment opportunities, it makes sense to take tax considerations into account in that part of your clients’ portfolios, too. This is truer than ever right now, when many non-U.S. funds may soon be losing the tax benefit of CLCFs.