The last 12 months have been a good reminder of how difficult it can be to accurately predict and time interest rate moves. For instance, after the surprising outcome of the Brexit vote
in June last year, the 10-Year U.S. Treasury Yield hit a multi-year low of 1.4% in July
. But following the unforeseen result in November’s U.S. Presidential election
, interest rates rallied
—by mid-December the 10-Year yield had reached 2.5%
. Going into 2017, rates were broadly expected to continue rising. Instead, the opposite has happened: The 10-year yield has dropped approximately 25 basis points
year-to-date as of June 12. Investors who attempted to reposition their portfolios in anticipation of interest rate moves prior to last year’s elections likely got whipsawed.
This is why I get concerned when investors question the value of fixed income in their portfolio anytime interest rates are expected to rise. Yes, when interest rates go up, the price of bonds goes down. However, there is more to investing in bonds than that:
- Bonds are a primary diversifier for equities
- In long-term investing, it’s the total portfolio outcome that matters—not the short-term movements of individual asset classes.
Let’s take each of these points in turn.
Bonds are a primary diversifier for equities
Most investors understand that equities are the primary driver of portfolio growth and that bonds are the primary risk reducer. But it can be easy to overlook the risk management benefits of bonds, depending on the prevailing capital market environment. In particular,
- during periods of prolonged equity rallies—because who feels they need downside protection when everything is marching upward by leaps and bounds?
- or when interest rates are expected to rise—because who wants to invest in an asset that is mathematically guaranteed to lose value under that scenario?
For those investors, the chart below may be a helpful reminder of the relative risks of stocks and bonds.
Source: Morningstar monthly max drawdown % for the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (“Fixed Income”) & the S&P 500 Index (“equities”) from 10/1/1989 to 3/31/2017. Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly.
As the chart shows, bonds (Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index) have a different return pattern than stocks (S&P 500® Index)—and bonds have been much less volatile than stocks:
- Over the 30 years ending March 2017, the largest drawdown in fixed income was -5%. The typical fixed income drawdown was less than -2%.
- Equity drawdowns dwarf those bond losses: The typical equity drawdown over the 30 years ending March 2017 was -10%. Shrink that time frame to 20 years ending March 2017 and the equity drawdowns are even more stark: greater than -40% and -50%.
So, investors are typically glad to hold bonds when equities correct. What’s more important, though, is that investors should always
hold bonds in alignment with their individual risk tolerance because it’s impossible to predict when
equities will correct.
The importance of taking a total portfolio view
It’s true that bond returns lag their historical averages during periods of rising interest rates. That’s simply how bonds work: Interest rates go up and bond prices go down. However, bonds are only one component of a total portfolio. A typical balanced portfolio also includes investments in global stocks, emerging markets stocks, real estate, commodities, high yield bonds, to name a few. It’s the interaction and return of all
of these asset classes together that matters—and what investors should focus on.
Source: Equity: MSCI World Index, Bonds: Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index; EM Eq: MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Jan 1988 – Mar 2017); REITs: FTSE NAREIT Equity Index, High Yield: BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index; EMD: JP Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index (Jan 1992 – Mar 2017); Commodities: Bloomberg Commodity Index (Feb 1991 – March 2017); Gold: Bloomberg Commodity Gold Index (Feb 1991 – Mar2017); Gold Stocks S&P Gold Stock Index; Balanced: 50% Stocks, 30% Bonds, 5% REITS, 5% High Yield, 5% EM, 5% Commodities
Index returns represent past performance, are not a guarantee of future performance, and are not indicative of any specific investment.
The above chart shows how some of the most common asset classes have historically behaved during periods of rising interest rates. As expected:
- Equities tend to do better than their average—because interest rates typically rise when economic growth is positive to strong.
- Bonds tend to do worse than their historical averages (but not negative) during rising rate periods.
Other asset classes have had more mixed results. But the most important relationship
is that of the hypothetical total (balanced) index portfolio. Its performance has hovered around average historical results when interest rates have increased. It’s the balance of stronger than average equity returns and weaker than average bond returns—i.e. diversification—
that helps create this outcome. Of course, diversification doesn’t protect against all loss or guarantee a profit, but hopefully it provides investors with some comfort that they don’t need to “take action” in periods of anticipated rate increases.
The bottom line
It’s easy to understand why investors may want to reduce their fixed income exposure when faced with rising interest rates. Unfortunately, correctly determining the timing and direction of interest rate moves can be very difficult, if not impossible. In addition, hypothetical diversified index portfolios have traditionally held up well during periods of rising rates, removing some of the justification for trying to avoid bonds in those environments.
Ultimately, it comes back to time-tested investment best practices: 1) select an asset allocation that matches investor risk tolerance and 2) have the conviction to maintain that discipline even when you’re tempted to deviate from the course.