
Fixed income has allowed investors to keep more of what they own
For investors concerned about the impact of rising interest rates on bonds, it can help to get some historical and cross-asset class perspective. Viewed through these lenses, the losses associated with owning fixed income have been muted relative to the experience of other asset classes. For example, between 1989 and March 2018, the worst time period in which to own bonds was January 1994 to November 1994. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index lost -5% in those dark days. To be sure, nobody likes experiencing negative returns—and a -5% loss in a bond portfolio does not go unnoticed. However, that bond market pullback represented just a fraction of the amount equities have lost during the last two recessions. During the tech bubble crash of 2000–2002 and the global financial crisis from 2007–2009 the Russell 3000® Index lost -47% and -51%, respectively. History suggests abandoning fixed income exposure in favor of stocks increases your risk of losing money opposed to reducing it.
Historically, investors have been rewarded by fixed income over the long run
Despite periods of short-term volatility, over the long run fixed income investors have been rewarded with positive returns from the asset class. Going back to 1976 there have been just two three-year time periods where the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index has not delivered a positive return and in each of those time periods (October 1979–September 1981 and April 1978–March 1980) the index still did not lose more than 1%. Over longer time periods such as five, 10 and 20 years, returns on the index have never been negative and provided investors with returns of at least 2% per year.
Total return includes both change in price and coupon payments
When thinking of rising rates, many investors focus only on the impact that rate increases have on the price of their bonds. They overlook the fact that the total return a bond investor earns over a given time period includes both the change in price and income received. It is possible to estimate the impact that rising rates will have on total return by comparing a bond’s current yield and duration–which is an estimate of how much a bond’s price will go down if interest rates increase by 1%. The example below shows an estimated impact of a 50-basis point increase in rates across various fixed income sectors based on current levels of yield and duration. As the example shows, despite the negative price impact of rising rates, the income portion of return is more than enough to offset the decline in price and still has the potential to result in a positive return.
Rising rates do not affect all sectors equally
While rising rates typically are not ideal for traditional fixed income sectors, there are certain areas of the asset class that have the potential to perform well in this type of environment. For example, bank loans, which typically are issued with floating interest rates, provide investors an opportunity to potentially benefit in time periods of rising rates. As the chart below shows, while year to date returns have been negative for most fixed income sectors, bank loans are up more than 2% on the year.
The bottom line
The last several months have been challenging for fixed income investors as interest rates have been on the rise. Despite concerns surrounding the asset class, investors should not abandon the allocation to bonds in their overall portfolio. History has shown that bonds preserve wealth much better than other asset classes such as stocks and that, over the long run, fixed income investors are rewarded. Maintaining exposure to multiple sectors within fixed income can help to reduce the risk associated with owning bonds in rising rate environments and could even result in achieving positive returns over those time periods.Disclosures
These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the top of the page. The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or entity.
This material is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to purchase any security.
Forecasting represents predictions of market prices and/or volume patterns utilizing varying analytical data. It is not representative of a projection of the stock market, or of any specific investment.
Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk, including the potential loss of principal invested. They do not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth. As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns.
Frank Russell Company is the owner of the Russell trademarks contained in this material and all trademark rights related to the Russell trademarks, which the members of the Russell Investments group of companies are permitted to use under license from Frank Russell Company. The members of the Russell Investments group of companies are not affiliated in any manner with Frank Russell Company or any entity operating under the "FTSE RUSSELL" brand.
The Russell logo is a trademark and service mark of Russell Investments.
This material is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, or distributed in any form without prior written permission from Russell Investments. It is delivered on an "as is" basis without warranty.
Russell Investments Financial Services, LLC, member FINRA, part of Russell Investments.
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index: An index, with income reinvested, generally representative of intermediate-term government bonds, investment grade corporate debt securities, and mortgage-backed securities. (specifically: Bloomberg Government/Corporate Bond Index, the Asset-Backed Securities Index, and the Mortgage-Backed Securities Index).
Bloomberg U.S. Credit Bond Index: Measures the performance of investment grade corporate debt and agency bonds that are dollar denominated and have a remaining maturity of greater than one year.
Russell 3000® Index: Index measures the performance of the largest 3000 U.S. companies representing approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market.
Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield FRN Index: A market value-weighted index which covers the U.S. non-investment grade fixed-rate debt market. The index is composed of U.S. dollar-denominated corporate debt in Industrial, Utility, and Finance sectors with a minimum $150 million par amount outstanding and a maturity greater than 1 year. The index includes reinvestment of income.
Bloomberg Intermediate Treasury Index: Measures the performance of U.S. Dollar denominated U.S. Treasuries, government-related and investment grade U.S. corporate securities that have a remaining maturity of greater than one year and less than ten years.
Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index: Measures the performance of investment grade corporate debt and agency bonds that are dollar denominated and have a remaining maturity of greater than one year.
Bloomberg Global High Yield Index: An index which provides a broad-based measure of the global high-yield fixed income markets. The Global High-Yield Index represents that union of the U.S. High-Yield, Pan-European High-Yield, U.S. Emerging Markets High-Yield, CMBS High-Yield, and Pan-European Emerging Markets High-Yield Indices.
Bloomberg Emerging Market Debt Index: Includes USD-denominated debt from emerging markets in the following regions: Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia.
Bloomberg 1-15 Year Muni Bond Index: Measures the performance of municipal bonds with maturities between one and 15 years.
RIFIS: 19934