On the latest edition of Market Week in Review, Chief Investment Strategist Erik Ristuben and Research Analyst Brian Yadao discussed the July U.S. employment report, the status of negotiations surrounding a second U.S. stimulus package and rising tensions between China and the U.S.
U.S. July job growth beats expectations, but slows from June
The U.S. Labor Department’s employment report for the month of July showed that the nation added 1.8 million jobs last month, Ristuben said, beating consensus expectations of around 1.4 million. “There’s both good news and bad news in this number,” he stated, noting that on one hand, more Americans were employed during July than in June. In addition, the report showed that many individuals in the hospitality and lodging sectors returned to work last month, Ristuben said.
On the other hand, the pace of job creation slowed markedly from June, when the U.S. economy added roughly 4.8 million jobs, he noted. “One of the chief worries among economists was that the resurgence in coronavirus cases could take most of the momentum out of the next nonfarm payrolls number—and that’s exactly what happened,” Ristuben explained. In addition, many of the jobs added during July were part-time positions, he said—an indication that many Americans are not working as many hours as they’d like.
The report also showed that the nation’s unemployment rate dropped to 10.2% in July—down from 11.1% in June. However, 10.2% is still a very high number, Ristuben said, noting that it remains above the peak unemployment rate witnessed during the Great Financial Crisis.
Debate continues over second round of U.S. coronavirus relief
Turning to the latest on coronavirus relief negotiations in the U.S., Ristuben said that Republican and Democratic party leaders in Congress remain at odds over the size of the proposed stimulus package. The House of Representatives wants a $3 trillion package, while Senate Republicans favor a smaller package, to the tune of $1 trillion dollars, he said.
“One of the biggest problems right now is that the Senate doesn’t have enough votes to pass its $1 trillion proposal, as there are a number of Republican senators that really don’t want to see any more stimulus,” Ristuben explained.“ This means that Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to get anything approved.”
In addition, there’s substantial disagreement over a Democratic proposal calling for $1 trillion in aid to state and local governments, he said, with both the Senate and the Trump administration opposed to such a measure. The parties are also struggling to come to a consensus on the size of weekly federal unemployment benefits for individuals, Ristuben said. “It’s looking like there will probably be a resumption in these benefits—which expired at the end of last month—but probably not to the previous level of $600 per week,” he noted.
Ultimately, Ristuben believes that Congress will reach a deal on a new coronavirus relief package—in part because it’s vital to keeping the economic recovery on track. “One of the main reasons that the U.S. economy has recovered as quickly as it has is because the benefits included in the last package—particularly the $1,200 stimulus checks for individuals—kept the American consumer in good financial stead,” he explained. This meant that when states reopened their economies in May and June, consumers could actually go out and pump their stimulus money into the economy, via spending at retail shops, restaurants and bars—which they did, Ristuben remarked.
“This, in a nutshell, is why the market believes more stimulus in necessary,” he stated. With the unemployment rate unlikely, in Ristuben’s opinion, to improve dramatically by year’s end, there will likely be plenty of individuals forced to navigate through financial hardships in the months ahead, Ristuben said. “These hardships will impair Americans’ overall ability to consume—and this in turn will likely reduce the speed and size of the economic recovery,” he noted.
TikTok, WeChat bans elevate China-U.S. tensions
Shifting to China-U.S. relations, Ristuben said that the U.S. government’s recent actions against Chinese companies—particularly the Aug. 6 executive orders that ban the use of social-media apps TikTok and WeChat in the U.S. in 45 days—increase the odds of a further escalation in tensions between the two countries.
“The concern among markets now is that China will retaliate for these moves—and that this could ultimately lead to a situation that may bear some partial resemblance to last year’s China-U.S. trade war,” he explained. Ristuben emphasized that at the moment, he and the team of Russell Investments strategists are not anticipating a return to a full-blown trade war. However, the situation warrants close watching, he said.
“The market is definitely growing a little nervous over all of this, especially because the executive orders may mean that both TikTok and WeChat—which are widely used in China—could end up being unavailable on Apple and Android devices,” Ristuben concluded.
Watch the video. Listen to the podcast. And subscribe.
Disclosures
These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the top of the page. The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or entity.
This material is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to purchase any security.
Forecasting represents predictions of market prices and/or volume patterns utilizing varying analytical data. It is not representative of a projection of the stock market, or of any specific investment.
Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk, including the potential loss of principal invested. They do not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth. As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns.
Frank Russell Company is the owner of the Russell trademarks contained in this material and all trademark rights related to the Russell trademarks, which the members of the Russell Investments group of companies are permitted to use under license from Frank Russell Company. The members of the Russell Investments group of companies are not affiliated in any manner with Frank Russell Company or any entity operating under the "FTSE RUSSELL" brand.
The Russell logo is a trademark and service mark of Russell Investments.
This material is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, or distributed in any form without prior written permission from Russell Investments. It is delivered on an "as is" basis without warranty.
Investing involves risk and principal loss is possible.
Past performance does not guarantee future performance.
Investments that are allocated across multiple types of securities may be exposed to a variety of risks based on the asset classes, investment styles, market sectors, and size of companies preferred by the investment managers. Investors should consider how the combined risks impact their total investment portfolio and understand that different risks can lead to varying financial consequences, including loss of principal. Please see a prospectus for further details.
Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly.
CORP-11729