Legislating tax changes: The rubber hits the road

Will Democrats trying to pass tax increases this fall go for a full loaf? Half a loaf? Or could they end up with no loaf? This month we will see many discussions, proposals, counterproposals and quick analyses of potential tax changes to be passed this year in support of President Joe Biden’s $3.5 trillion spending bill.


President Biden campaigned on his intent to increase income tax rates for those making more than $400,000. During the campaign, he put forward some specific tax changes to support his policies. Now the rubber is about to hit the road to see what might actually pass.  

 

The president is aiming for a bill with a target price tag of $3.5 trillion (T) to be spent over 10 years. The entire amount will not be spent in Year 1. Based on the recent budget resolution framework, the spending bill increases the budget by $1.75T with an additional $1.75T from incremental revenue and/or cost savings ($1.75 + $1.75 = $3.5T) The current tax debate is around finding the pay-fors related to the latter $1.75T.  The fewer pay-fors means less revenue and reduced policy ambitions. Giddy up!  

 

How can they pass a tax increase? 


Given the narrow majorities in both the Senate and the House, the only avenue for proposed tax increases is through the budget reconciliation process. 


Makeup of current Congress

Budget reconciliation is not straightforward and involves an interesting legislative path with defined parliamentary procedures. A few key points:

 

  • Passes with simple majority / not the three-fifths majority usually required in the Senate.
  • The bill cannot be filibustered by the minority party.
  • Debate on the final bill is limited to 20 hours.
  • Does not allow for amendments to the bill if there are associated costs (raise revenue/cut taxes).
  • The process was created by the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and has been used 21 times since 1980.
  • Because of the Byrd Rule (named after the former West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd), any proposed increase to the deficit cannot extend beyond 10 years. This is why many of the individual provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire after 2025. The same  was true for the sunsetting of the tax-rate reductions under former President George W. Bush’s tax plan back in the early 2000s.

Given these very narrow majorities, every member of Congress holds incredible sway over the outcome. We will undoubtedly hear the names of Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, but it only takes one senator or three members of the House to alter any bill’s progress. And those who recall the election of Scott Brown to the U.S. Senate in 2010 know how quickly and unexpectedly narrow voting majorities can change. 

 

 

What tax rates are in the crosshairs for investors?


Recall that then-candidate Biden campaigned on not raising taxes on anyone making less than $400,000. On Sept. 12
, we gained more clarity from the Democratic members of the House Ways & Means Committee and Senate Finance Committees as specifics were released reflecting their thinking to achieve the required revenue.1 Again, this process is fast-moving and extremely fluid, but indicative of the type of bargaining and negotiations needed to get the required majorities. Any final bill will be a compromise of the current and future proposals. Some of the topics impacting individual investors:

1. 
Top marginal rate to increase from 37% to 39.6%

  • Updated proposals show this top rate is for couples with filing status of Married Filing Jointly (MFJ) and taxable income above $450,000. This number keeps moving around.
  • It remains unknown where the final threshold falls, but increasing the rate from 37% seems to have broad Democratic support.
  • A new twist is the addition of an excise tax of 3% for individuals and married taxpayers with adjusted gross income (AGI) above $5 million. This tax may also apply to capital gains as well as ordinary income.
  • Absent government action, the top rate will revert to 39.6% in 2026.

2. Long-term capital gain and qualified dividend tax rate to move from 20% to 39.6% + plus the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) already in effect

  • Initially proposed for those with adjusted gross income > $1,000,000. 
  • It is still to be determined where the rate falls. There is lots of hesitancy among several Democrats to an increase of this magnitude.
  • The Sept. 12 proposal includes a top rate of 25% (plus the 3.8% NIIT). 
  • It seems that any increase may well be lower than the initially proposed rate of 39.6%.

3. Removing the step-up in basis at death for appreciated assets

  • Initially proposed for taxpayers with capital gains greater than $1,000,000 (per taxpayer).
  • Lots of pushback and unease on this one. One former Democratic senator is openly campaigning against eliminating the step-up in basis at death2 while several current Democratic Senators have expressed their unease. 
  • The Sept. 12 proposal does not address eliminating the step-up in basis at death.
  • As we wrote back in Decembereliminating this tax-planning strategy may be easier to propose than to actually pass. It will be interesting to watch where this goes.

4. Corporate tax rates

  • The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. The administration initially proposed a new rate of 28%.
  • Several Democrat senators are on record saying 28% is too high.  
  • The Sept 12 proposal leads with a top rate of 26.5% but with lower tiers based on total corporate taxable income. This tiered structure is new to the discussion. 

5. Taxing carried interest as ordinary income

  • Carried interest is the income received from hedge funds and private equity investments. This income is generally treated as long-term capital gains and taxed at a lower rate than ordinary income. (Top rate would go from 20% to 39.6%)
  • One compromise proposal extends the holding period from three years to five before an investor receives the lower tax rate. Investors here would also pay a higher rate as stated in #2 above.
  • In discussing many of these changes with Jeff Kummer, managing director within Deloitte’s tax policy group, he suggested that, given the low amount of tax revenue associated with this, the Democrats may prefer to leave it in place so they can continue to campaign and rail against it!

What is the timing?


The rest of September and into October will be very busy.

  • Sept. 15 is the deadline for the reconciliation package. This starts the process of combining the various bills into a single, budget reconciliation package for negotiation. 
  • Sept. 21 is my birthday. And Bill Murray’s. 
  • Sept. 27, the House votes on the Senate’s $1.2 infrastructure bill. Note this bill does not have any individual tax changes similar to the reconciliation bill referenced above. They are different pieces of legislation. 
  • Sept. 30 is the end of the fiscal year for the U.S. government and marks what seems to the be the annual exercise of passing a budget to fund the government and an argument over increasing the debt ceiling.

If tax increases pass this fall, the actual implementation date is still to be determined. Nothing precludes a tax increase from being retroactive to the first of the year or when a bill is proposed (President Biden announced his specific plan on April 28) or when officially passed. In fact, the Sept. 12 proposal suggests an effective date of Sept. 13 for some of the increases—but not all. Note that a few Democrat senators have come out against retroactive application. It seems challenging for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to administratively implement such major changes this late in the filing year. If the tax rate changes are effective retroactively, it will undoubtedly be over the protests of many.


Will the Democratic Party hold out for a full loaf to include $1.75T in incremental revenue? Half a loaf? Or no loaf in regard to taxes? One analyst compared passing the full range of tax increases to trying to thread a needle—from outer space. Needless to say, the next few weeks will be very informative. 

Conversations with clients 


Given the frequency of news stories around taxes, I’ve found that many folks believe that taxes have already gone up. The increased buzz around taxes is a great opportunity to take the uncertainty on tax policy and bring it back to what you can help your client control around taxes: Being tax-smart around asset location, investment selection, withdrawal strategies and gain recognition. All of these are higher value services you can offer. Anytime taxes are in the news, it makes clients and prospects much more receptive about the value you offer on these topics

 

The other point that comes up repeatedly in my conversations with investors about these potential changes is the reaction: whew, my income is below these thresholds—looks like I dodged the tax bullet! Acknowledge that might be true, but they may not dodge the existing bullet around the current tax rates on capital gains, dividends and income.  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act did not lower the rate for long-term capital gains and qualified dividends. Those bullets are still out there and incoming for this capital gains season


Click image to enlarge

Long-term capital gains
Source: Russell Investments

Remind your client that not every tax proposal or story they hear will become law. In fact, few will. The amount of internet clickbait put in front of investors makes it challenging to separate the possibilities, probabilities and even wild speculation. This is where you can help.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-democrats-eye-26-5-corporate-tax-rate-11631484260?mod=hp_lead_pos3
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/01/former-democratic-senator-sounds-the-alarm-about-bidens-tax-plan.htm